🔗 Share this article

The composer Avril Coleridge-Taylor continually bore the weight of her father’s heritage. Being the child of Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, one of the most famous British composers of the turn of the 20th century, the composer’s identity was enveloped in the lingering obscurity of the past.

An Inaugural Recording

Not long ago, I sat with these legacies as I got ready to make the inaugural album of the composer’s 1936 piano concerto. With its intense musical themes, expressive melodies, and bold rhythms, Avril’s work will provide music lovers deep understanding into how the composer – a wartime composer born in 1903 – conceived of her world as a woman of colour.

Past and Present

However about legacies. It can take a while to acclimate, to see shapes as they truly exist, to distinguish truth from misrepresentation, and I had been afraid to face Avril’s past for some time.

I earnestly desired the composer to be her father’s daughter. Partially, that held. The idyllic English tones of her father’s impact can be detected in several pieces, for example From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). But you only have to look at the names of her parent’s works to realize how he identified as not only a flag bearer of British Romantic style but a representative of the African diaspora.

At this point father and daughter appeared to part ways.

American society evaluated Samuel by the excellence of his music as opposed to the his ethnicity.

Parental Heritage

While he was studying at the renowned institution, the composer – the child of a Sierra Leonean father and a Caucasian parent – started to lean into his background. Once the poet of color this literary figure arrived in England in that era, the 21-year-old composer was keen to meet him. He composed this literary work as a composition and the subsequent year incorporated his poetry for an opera, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral composition that established his reputation: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.

Drawing from the poet Longfellow’s The Song of Hiawatha, this composition was an worldwide sensation, notably for African Americans who felt shared pride as white America assessed his work by the brilliance of his music rather than the his background.

Principles and Actions

Success failed to diminish his beliefs. During that period, he attended the initial Pan African gathering in the UK where he made the acquaintance of the Black American thinker WEB Du Bois and witnessed a range of talks, including on the subjugation of Black South Africans. He was a campaigner throughout his life. He sustained relationships with trailblazers for equality like Du Bois and Booker T Washington, delivered his own speeches on equality for all, and even engaged in dialogue on issues of racism with the US President on a trip to the White House in the early 1900s. Regarding his compositions, reminisced Du Bois, “he wrote his name so notably as a musician that it will long be remembered.” He passed away in 1912, aged 37. Yet how might the composer have thought of his child’s choice to travel to this country in the 1950s?

Controversy and Apartheid

“Child of Celebrated Artist expresses approval to apartheid system,” ran a headline in the Black American publication Jet magazine. Apartheid “struck me as the right policy”, Avril told Jet. When asked to explain, she revised her statement: she was not in favor with apartheid “in principle” and it “ought to be permitted to run its course, overseen by good-intentioned people of diverse ethnicities”. If Avril had been more aligned to her parent’s beliefs, or born in segregated America, she may have reconsidered about the policy. Yet her life had sheltered her.

Background and Inexperience

“I have a British passport,” she said, “and the government agents did not inquire me about my background.” Therefore, with her “porcelain-white” skin (as described), she traveled among the Europeans, supported by their acclaim for her late father. She gave a talk about her family’s work at the Cape Town university and led the national orchestra in Johannesburg, featuring the heroic third movement of her concerto, subtitled: “In remembrance of my Father.” Even though a confident pianist on her own, she never played as the soloist in her concerto. Instead, she always led as the conductor; and so the segregated ensemble followed her lead.

She desired, in her own words, she “might bring a transformation”. However, by that year, the situation collapsed. When government agents became aware of her African heritage, she could no longer stay the country. Her UK document offered no defense, the UK representative recommended her departure or be jailed. She returned to England, deeply ashamed as the magnitude of her innocence dawned. “This experience was a difficult one,” she stated. Adding to her disgrace was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her unceremonious exit from South Africa.

A Familiar Story

While I reflected with these legacies, I sensed a recurring theme. The story of being British until it’s challenged – one that calls to mind Black soldiers who fought on behalf of the British during the global conflict and lived only to be denied their due compensation. And the Windrush generation,